Comments on: Moving Towards Photography

By: Paul

Paul — Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:17:07 +0000

I’ve asked some friends to go film photography shooting with me. My view camera is still set up and the lens and holders are loaded. Just like in the olden days my motivation was tied to others’. Would I shoot black and white film and make silver prints if I had a darkroom? Not sure. I might scan a negative and print that with inkjet printer. But Sometimes, when the photo called for it I’d make a silver print…especially if it’s an 8×10″ of Taos Pueblo.

By: Bryce Lee

Bryce Lee — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 03:09:09 +0000

Suspect as times change image recording devices also change.
The new devices are fictious, the images do not exist except as an electronic charge recorded on a storage device. The electronic charge needs to be viewed on a screen similar to film as processed.
Film and glass plates beforehand could be physically handled. Not so this new digital,it can only exist as a printed image, unlike the negative as a long lasting image on the plastic or glass negative.

My own problem is digital is not for me slide film; Kodachrome is gone so it is E-6. After 50 plus years of doing mostly slide photography with ongoing side trips to black & white find this new digital method is for lack of a
better description colour negative film which resulted in the past,
colour prints.

So like you Steve,(and others) I find film comfortable, digital
is weird. Prefer my Nikon F100; my
small Canon point & shoot for those
"other" images.

The big problem here is a lack of viable processing; presently a roll of 36 exposure Provia costs to $1.32 a slide. Many of my friends still are noncoumputer and not digital. Therefore understand your plight. Follow your dream, film is
happy time, digital is photography on steroids. Oh, and film will survive 100 years; digital, 10 seconds if that.

By: VStar Lady

VStar Lady — Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:23:16 +0000

Steve to me it is the feeling of losing the past, of losing longevity…Digital seems to be so ‘disposable,’like so many other things in life today.
Life has changed, just think of it as freedom to create art with less cost and with less inhalation of carcinogens. Then smile and print on something as permanent as you possibly can. Steve, your photos are timeless – even in megapixels. (I’ve been running a(now)13 year old experiment to compare longevity of prints, it’s been interesting.)

By: Richard M

Richard M — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 23:07:12 +0000

I had sold my SLR equipment when I moved to Alaska and didn't really embrace digital until about 2009. Until then, I played with digital cameras back in the mid 1990s but was never satisfied with their output.

That being said, I don't miss the chemicals and the darkroom and I though I love the look of the old Cibachrome color prints, digital is way easier.

By: Mark Myers

Mark Myers — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:37:54 +0000

I actually found digital to be liberating. I had almost stopped shooting any film unless I was getting paid and I found developing a chore. A digital camera felt like I was freeing up the creative process to me. Guess it’s all personal preferences.

By: Charlie6

Charlie6 — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:31:17 +0000

Wow Steve, your mentioning of Tri-X triggered a flood of memories of standing in a dark room, developing film and processing prints…..hadn’t thought of that name for decades!

By: D. Brent Miller

D. Brent Miller — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 13:51:36 +0000

Steve, I went through the film vs. digital a few years back. I used to shoot B&W film passionately producing documentary projects and exhibits. Then commercial photography almost demanded the use of digital. Customers wanted it now, not wanting to wait for film to be processed and proofs submitted. A long distance move that resulted in the loss of my darkroom was the nail in the coffin. No darkroom, but I could still develop film and then scan it, but it just wasn’t the same. With decisions made, I moved on and sold my Hasselblad to someone who would use it passionately. Now, I’m trying to return to the photographic passion with a variety of digital cameras and techniques that are immediate. It’s convenient … but not quite the same. I won’t say it’s better. Just different.

Brent

By: bob skoot

bob skoot — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 05:09:27 +0000

Steve:

I have two M6's both with abrahamsson Rapidwinders, and a collection of Summicrons and a summilux. I also have a handful of LTM and many SM lenses, my favourite being a Leica II black with matching nickle elmar. I was one of the last to embrace the digital age but somehow it seems like too much work to dig out the chemicals

. . . so you are not alone

bob
Riding the Wet Coast

By: Paul Smail

Paul Smail — Tue, 07 Jan 2014 02:53:19 +0000

Hopefully film is not quite dead yet. I dug out my trusty F3 and bought a few rolls of Tri-X to make a few photographs in the next month or so.

I feel that film forces me to slow down and be more deliberate in considering things like light and composition. But maybe that is only an excuse for an adherent to the Old Ways, like carburetion and physical throttle linkages.